VERY Interesting News you won't get easily!

The final moments of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu before she was brutally killed in 2006 has been revealed in vivid details in a French newspaper today.

Journalist Arnaud Dubus, who traveled halfway across the world - from Kuala Lumpur to Ulan Bator, Mongolia and finally to Paris - for his investigation, unearthed a piece of documentary evidence exposing how Altantuya was allegedly killed.

The document - said to be obtained from a source in the Malaysian police - has not been revealed during the two-year-long murder trial of Altantuya. According to a lawyer who was involved in the case, the document which is a caution statement made by an accused in the grisly murder, could not be admitted in court after the law was amended.

In his report which appeared in left-wing Liberation newspaper, Dubus wrote that the document revealed "dry and precise descriptions" on how Altantuya was killed.Malaysiakini is unable to reproduce all the details of the document due to possible legal complications that could arise as a result of the on-going murder trial.

Last month, Shah Alam High Court judge Mohd Zaki Md Yasin set April 9 to deliver his decision on the fate Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri - the two special action force police personnel accused of murdering Altantuya.The police document obtained by Dubus detailed on how Altantuya, who was referred as ‘the Chinese woman' in the document, had begged for her life, and stated that she had children, before she was shot.

It also mentioned that Altantuya was shot on the left side of her face, after which her clothes were removed from her body and put in a black plastic bag.

According to the document, Altantuya was shot another time when her hand was seen to be still moving.Altantuya was subsequently carried into the woods where explosives were wrapped around her legs, her abdomen and her head before she was blown to pieces.

The document clearly identified Altantuya's killers and the respective roles they played. Three months of investigationDubus told Malaysiakini that he spent three months investigating the case.

"I spent two weeks in Kuala Lumpur, then went to Ulan Bator where I stayed one week. Then, in Paris in January where I spent 10 days," he said in an email interview.

In his Liberation report, which was written in French, Dubus wrote about Altantuya's relationship with political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda and the role she played in the purchase of French submarines by the Malaysian government.

"In March 2005, Altantuya and (Abdul Razak) Baginda departed for Europe, touring France, Germany, Italy and Portugal in the red Ferrari of Baginda, staying in posh hotels and dining in the finest restaurants of the old Continent. "This trip, however, was not only for tourism: the contract for the sale of the submarines had been signed in 2002, but important details had yet to be settled," wrote Dubus.

"We knew that Baginda was used by Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak as an intermediary for weapons systems deals, especially the high level ones," a regional security affairs expert had told Dubus.

Dubus also quoted Altantuya's cousin as saying that Altantuya and Abdul Razak were in Paris in March 2005, where they met with Najib."A picture taken at the end of March 2005 shows the three in a Parisian private club," he wrote, disputing a denial by Najib that he had ever met Altantuya.

He said that the story "turned dramatic" when in October 2006 Altantuya was informed that the commission paid by the French-Spanish company Armaris - which sold three submarines to the Malaysian government for one billion euros (RM4.7 billion) - had arrived at a Kuala Lumpur bank account.It was revealed that 115 million euro (RM541 million) commission had been paid to Perimekar, a company owned by Abdul Razak.

"Altantuya rushed to Kuala Lumpur, in order to claim her share of the commission from Baginda; she said she was entitled to US$500,000."Baginda and Altantuya broke up prior to this. A jealous Rosmah Mansor, the feared businesswoman and wife of Najib, objected any payment to Altantuya.

"Altantuya arrived in Kuala Lumpur with two other Mongolian women, one of them was a shaman responsible for putting a spell on Baginda if he refused to pay."For several days, Altantuya harassed her ex-lover. On Oct 18, Baginda could no longer tolerate the daily scenes made by Altantuya in front of his house," wrote Dubus.Subsequently, two police officers from the special unit tasked to provide protection to VIPs including Najib, were asked to "neutralise the Chinese woman."It wasn't a perfect crime

The case was not a perfect crime, said Dubus. Altantuya was kidnapped by the two police officers in front Abdul Razak's house."The taxi driver hired by Altantuya for the day did not appreciate that his passenger was kidnapped under his eyes without payment for the fare. He took note of the registration plate of the kidnapper's car and filed a complaint at the local police station.The police were able to quickly identify the car.

"Events unfolded that even the Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak could not impede. He tried to cover the case. A few hours before the arrest of Baginda, he sent him a SMS:

‘I will see the inspector general of police at 11am today... 'The problem will be solved. Be cool'.
"A few hours after, Baginda was arrested as well as the two police officers, Azilah and Sirul."Abdul Razak was initially charged with conspiring in the killing of Altantuya but he was acquitted without being called to enter his defence. (and no appeal was made)

Dubus said that the case is not only embarrassing to Najib, who is linked to the case, but also DCNS - the French military shipbuilding company which bought over Armaris in 2007.
The 45-year-old French journalist, who is based in Bangkok, has written several books on Southeast Asian history and politics, including a book on the military in Indonesia and Thailand.According to him, his next book could be on the Altantuya case.

LET'S SEE THESTAR AND NST WRITE UP THIS ARTICLE!!

How Malaysian Chinese are funding the corrupt cops!!

I tell you why the police is on the BN side!

1. BN is corrupt right?!?!

2. Under BN wide spread corruption will continue to go on! Correct?!?!?

3. The corrupt police (not all the police ah!) are happy with this!

4. The corrupt police knows that their main source of pocket money will dry up it PKR comes to power!

5. Also most of these corrupt police has skeleton in their closet already! And I am sure that BN will use these things to blackmail them. (i.e. if you don't do what I say I will show prove that you have taken bribe!)

So how can we hit where it will hurt the corrupt police (again I want to stress that not all police are corrupt).


Attack where the money is!!

Where is that?!?

Illegal DVDs lah!
Prostitution den's like the shady health spa, and massage parlor!
The "cyber cafe" shops that are actually gambling dens!!
All the illegal immigrant working here in pubs, night clubs, massage parlor and etc!

Illegal 4-D syndicate!
All this industry need to bribe the police to keep their business in operation what!!
And these undustry make a lot a lot of money ok!!!

If you think about it! Most of these industries are run by Chinese!
Thus actually the Malaysian Chinese are funding the coffers of the corrupt police!

Attack these industries and you will put a dent in the corrupt police's income!!!

Until you see a change in this illegal industries?!?! You can be assure that the police will always be on the BN side!!

NOT FAIR!!! NOT FAIR!! NOT FAIR!!!

WHERE IS THE JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS IN THIS CASE?!?!?

How can this Judicial commissioner Ridwan Ibrahim ask the State Legal Advisor to represent Perak Speaker Sivakumar?

State Legal Advisor, Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid had previously claimed to be representing Zambry in a suit over who is the lawful menteri besar at the KL High Court.

Can't the Judge see that there is a conflict of interested?!?
And why was the judgement made in the chamber and not in the public?!
This in fact made it look like all of BN goons were in the chamber ploting together!
There were no one really representing the opposition during the judgement!!

This is not fair!!!

Are Umno's politicians, lawyers and judges illiterate?!! The state and federal constitutions clearly spell out the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and the judiciary.

This clearly means that the courts cannot interfere with the State Assembly!!
Any interference by the courts will violate the constitution and create an even bigger constitutional crisis which strikes at the heart of our Westminister system of government.
BN's gang are clearly hell bent on breaking all constitution law to serve their own selfish purpose!!

This is not legal and fair lah!

And since when is the State Secretary more powerful than the State Speaker?!?
Yet first time in history State Secretary can lock the State Speaker out of the Assembly!

This is UNFAIR AND UNJUST!!!

Lets see if TheStar and other main stream media report this important matter!

'I can prove Najib tried to bribe me'

An opposition politician today said he is prepared to go to court to prove his allegation that Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had offered him RM50 million to engineer at least two defections in Perak.

Ipoh Barat division chief Fauzi Muda said since the police and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) are serious about investigating his statutory declaration, they should either charge him or Najib. "I challenge them to charge me. I am prepared to go to court to reveal all the evidence that I have including a recording of my conversation with Najib. I challenge the police to charge me as I know the police and MACC will not charge Najib "If they charge me, it will be the best way for me to face Najib in court and reveal all the evidence that I have," he told reporters this morning after filing a MACC report in Ipoh. Fauzi is seeking the MACC's help to stop the police from 'intimidating and harassing' him over his statutory declaration.

Why are the cops involved? The PKR leader also expressed surprise over the police's involvement in the matter, accusing them of acting beyond their duty since there was no report lodged by Najib or his representatives against him. "In fact, the police have been instructed to act on my statutory declaration. I was instructed to come to the Ipoh police station on Feb 10. Following that, the police contacted me many times for me to come and they took further statements."On Monday (March 2), I was asked to report to the serious crimes unit in Ipoh where they took more statements. What is the motive for the police in this case as I made the report to the MACC?" he asked.On Feb 2, Fauzi made a statutory declaration that Najib had offered RM50 million to him - when he met the deputy premier at his official residence on March 11, 2008 - to arrange the defections before Pakatan Rakyat menteri besar Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin came to power.

Fauzi said the recent defections of Pakatan Rakyat state reps, leading to the change in state government, was strong proof in relation to his allegation against Najib. Following his declaration, a report was lodged with the (MACC) by PKR Youth chief Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin on Feb 4.On the same day, Fauzi said, the three Pakatan Rakyat assemblypersons (two from PKR, and one from DAP) had declared their defection before Najib and to support BN.

In his statutory declaration, Fauzi also claimed that former deputy defence minister Zainal Abidin Zin brought him to Najib's official residence where he was offered the money. Zainal Abidin later admitted taking Fauzi to meet Najib but denied that any monetary offers were made.

FINALLY The real reason for Kugan's death!

HE WAS BEATEN TO DEATH!!

As reported by Malaysiakini...
According to the post-mortem report, the beating caused a breakdown in Kugan's muscle cells, which then congested the blood flow which in turn caused a kidney failure.The pictorial evidence also showed that Kugan suffered from massive internal bleeding due to severe beating.The independent post-mortem report was commissioned by Kugan's family after they were dissatisfied with the report tendered by the Serdang Hospital authorities that Kugan had died due to liquid in his lungs.

So the question is...who could have beaten Kugan to death??!?! (afterall he was under the protection of the police what!)

And the answer is....!!!!!!
(I cannot answer less I also be beaten to death...you answer yourself lah!)

(For further reading)

THE STUPIDITY OF SOME MALAY MUSLIMS

This is an article from RPK!

The guy is not afraid of anything man!!

Posted by admin Friday, 27 February 2009 16:22
Some Malays, PKR and PAS Malays included, are very narrow-minded and ignorant. And this is because they recite the Quran like parrots without understanding what they are reciting -- mainly because they do not speak the language of the Quran.

Herald editor says ban on ‘Allah’ lifted with conditions
A church official says the government has lifted a ban on the use of the word "Allah" by Christian publications.
Rev. Lawrence Andrew, the editor of the Catholic Church's Herald newspaper, said today the Home Ministry is allowing the publications use "Allah" to refer to God as long as they state that the material is only meant for Christians.
The controversy first broke out in late 2007 when the government banned the use of “Allah” in Christian Malay-language texts because it allegedly might confuse Muslims.
The Herald has challenged the ban in court and argued the Arabic word is a common reference for God that predates Islam and has been used for centuries as a translation in Malay. — AP, 26 Feb 2009

The High Court has set May 28 for hearing in the suit taken by the Catholic Church against the home minister and the federal government in which the church does not want any parties to intervene in its case over the use of the word "Allah".
Justice Lau Bee Lan, of the Appellate and Special Powers Division, also set July 7 to hear the arguments by several state Islamic councils to transfer the case to the Federal Court. — The Malaysian Insider, 27 Feb 2009

On 16 February 2009, the Home Minister, Syed Hamid Albar, signed a gazette known as Gazette PU A 62 under section 22 (1)(c) of the Internal Security Act 1969 -- titled Internal Security (Prohibition On Use of Specific Words on Document and Publication) Order 2009.
The gazette states as follows: Prohibition on use of specific words on document and publication 2. (1) The printing, publication, sale, issue, circulation and possession of any document and publication relating to Christianity containing the words “Allah”, “Kaabah”, “Baitullah” and “Solat” are prohibited unless on the front cover of the document and publication are written with the words “For Christianity”.
(2) The words “For Christianity” referred to in subparagraph (1) shall be written clearly in font type Arial of size 16 in bold.
A spokesman from the publication and Quranic text division of the Ministry said he was unaware of the gazette and would check with its legal division. A Christian church leader said this matter should first be discussed before made into law, as the churches are not even aware of this new ruling.

He expressed surprise that this new gazette has prematurely come into force when there are two cases before the courts to argue the constitutionality of the earlier prohibition by the ministry. The Catholic Church is suing the government over its insistence that they cannot use the Allah word in the Bahasa Malaysia section of their weekly publication.
The Sidang Injil Borneo Sabah (Evangelical Church) is also suing the government over confiscation of their Christian publications imported from Indonesia, which contain the word Allah.

Previously, the Home Ministry, in an out of court negotiation, had suggested that churches stamp the word “For Christians Only” on the Al Kitab and their Bahasa Malaysia publications. But this was not acceptable to the churches, which had counter-offered with the phrase “This is a Christian Publication.” The Ministry, however, rejected this counter-proposal.
PKR’s Member of Parliament for Bandar Baharu Kulim, Zulkifli Nordin, is also up in arms about the matter. And this is his response to the matter:

“Have they referred to the related decree? The ministry should not compromise on this matter. We should look at the social context where the word is used by the Malay Muslims in the country, what is the reason behind their insistence on using ‘Allah’. I am worried that the word ‘Allah’ was used with the aim to confuse the Muslims. Does God’s name follow the race or language? I have no problem with the use of the Malay language, but by using the word ‘Allah’ to refer to God, it made the Muslims unhappy, I have met a lot of them who told me this.”
Were you aware that it is a crime for non-Muslims to greet Muslims with the phrase ‘Assalamu Alaikum’? It is also a crime for non-Muslims to use words such as insha-Allah, masha-Allah, Alhamdulillah, and so on. There are about half a dozen ‘banned’ words that non-Muslims may not use in their daily communication, basically all words that contain the word ‘Allah’.
About twenty or so years ago, the MCA chief for Kuala Terengganu, Wong, would speak to his Malay friends as if he was a Muslim. If you had your back to him when he spoke you would have thought that a Malay was speaking. Imagine your surprise when you turn around to find a Chinaman speaking better than even Malays could.

Wong was very free with words like insha-Allah, Alhamdulillah, masha-Allah, etc. And the Terengganu Malays loved him for that. When he contested the Kuala Terengganu state seat in the 1990 general election, he lost to the PAS candidate, Ustaz Haji Harun Jusoh. Wong won all the Malay votes at Losong and Pulau Kambing. However, he lost the Chinese votes from Kampong Cina who voted for Ustaz Harun.

Malays like to call Chinese Muslims mualap (mualaf). When I went to China more than 15 years ago I visited the oldest mosque in China. It was at Kwangchow (Canton) and was built 100 years after Prophet Muhammad’s time. That’s right, the Chinese were Muslims 700 or 800 years before the Malays and when the Malays were still Hindus, Buddhists, tree worshippers, and so on. But only the Malays are true Muslims while the Chinese are mualaps.
I met the Imam of the Kwangchow mosque and he spoke to me in Arabic. I replied, “Mafi kalam Arabi.” He was surprised because I just did my prayers in the mosque, which he assumed I would have performed in Arabic.

“You don’t speak Arabic?”
“No,” I replied.
“You can read the Quran?”
“Yes,” I replied.
“You can read the Quran but you can’t speak Arabic? How do you do that?”
“I recite only, not read.”
“So you can’t understand what you recite?”
“No,” I replied.
“What kind of Muslim are you? You recite the Quran but can’t understand what you are reciting.”
“Well, I am the same as 99% other Muslims in Malaysia. We all don’t speak Arabic and can’t understand what we are reciting.”
The Imam shook his head and went off to pray for God to have mercy on me -- and the 99% other Malay Muslims in Malaysia.
What’s all this brouhaha about the word Allah in the Malay language translation of the Bible? First, take a look at this:
[Genesis 1:1 - English Bible - King James Version]"In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth . . . "
[Genesis 1:1 - Arabic transliteration]"Fee al-badi' khalaqa Allahu as-Samaawaat wa al-Ard . . . "
[Genesis 1:1 - Arabic Bible]

[John 3:16 - English Bible - King James Version]"For God so loved the world, that . . . "
[John 3:16 - Arabic transliteration]"Li-annhu haakadha ahabba Allahu al-'Aalama hataa badhala . . . "
[John 3:16 - Arabic Bible]
[Luke 1:30 - English Bible - King James Version]" . . . Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God."
[Luke 1:30 - Arabic transliteration]" . . . Laa takhaafee, yaa Maryam, li-annaki qad wajadti ni'amat(an) i'nda Allahi."
[Luke 1:30 - Arabic Bible]
[Luke 3:38 - English Bible - New King James Version]"the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God."
[Luke 3:38 - Arabic transliteration]"bini Anoosha, bini Sheeti, bini Aaadama, abni Allahi."
[Luke 3:38 - Arabic Bible]
The word Allah is already in the Bible. It is exactly the same word that the Jews, in Hebrew, use for God (eloh), the word that Jesus Christ used in Aramaic when he prayed to God. In Hebrew, Huwa el Elah or HUWA 'L LAH means HE IS ALLAH in the verse QUL HUWAL LAH HU AHAD.
"My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” said Jesus on the cross. In Aramaic this is: "Eli, Eli, l'mana Sabachtani?"
The words El, Elah and Elohim are not three distinctly different words. They all represent the single Arabic word, Allah, which is also the same in Hebrew.
No, Islam does not have monopoly over the use of the word Allah. The Christians and Jews too use this same word. In fact, the biggest ‘selling point’ for Islam is that the Quran recognises all the Prophets of the Jews and Christians and that we all pray to the same ONE God, Allah. If the God of the Jews, Christians and Muslims is the same one God, would not then the name of this God also be the same? How can the name of the Muslim God be different from that of the Jews and Christians if we all pray to the same one God?
Some Malays, PKR and PAS Malays included, are very narrow-minded and ignorant. And this is because they recite the Quran like parrots without understanding what they are reciting -- mainly because they do not speak the language of the Quran. And, for sure, they do not read any of the Holy Books of the other religions because they are of the opinion that it is forbidden (haram) to do so. It is said that even Prophet Muhammad sought advice from his wife’s, Khatijah’s cousin, Warakah, a learned Christian scholar of his time, though some scholars refute this (but they do admit that Warakah was a Christian who attended Prophet Muhammad’s and Khatijah’s wedding).
And Prophet Muhammad never prohibited the Jews and Christians from using the word Allah. But then Malays think they are better Muslims and more learned than the Arabs even though Malays recite the Quran without understanding what they are reciting -- unlike the Chinese Muslims in China. And what are 16 million Malay Muslims compared to the more than 100 million in China, the mualaps, as the Malays would call them, who have been Muslims since 1,300 years ago when Malays were still praying to trees and whatnot.

See for yourself what really happen! (Updated)

With regards to the Kapal Singh being assaulted by UMNO youth's gangster!

This is what really happen in Parliament! See for yourself with your own eyes and do not believe the bullsh!T TheStar tries to sell you!

This is undeniable prove of the uncivilized UMNO youth breaking the law by blocking Kapal Singh from entering parliament!!!



How come there are no arrest?!?! Still not enough evidence ah?!?!?
Our PDRM is really a big joke lah!!!

AND as for the Parliament speaker?!?
What does he do?!?!
OF COURSE he does what is stated in the UMNO manual book for dummies!!

Step 1: Call to set up a committee to investigate!
Step 2: DO ABSOLUTE NOTHING!!!
Step3: Delay as long as you can!!!
Step4: When things has die down and you think that the public has forgotten about the issue, just stamp NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN on the file and state the reason for it as lack of evidence!!!!
Step5: Go collect your bribe from whoever you help get out of trouble!!!

If you need prove of this, just look at the:
1. Lingam Case
2.Kugan Case
3. Selangor Satay King Case
4. All the UMNO and BN related case that were lodge with ACA and now MACC.

Can anybody tell me if there were any of this case that were charge, convicted and jailed?!?!
???????

OK at least this time the four UMNO youth leaders, Latt Sharizan Abdullah (PJ Utara), Megat Zulkarnain Omar Din (Gombak), Azahari Shaari (Shah Alam) and Ungku Md Salleh Ungku Abd Jamal (Serdang) were fined RM1000 per person. But that is peanuts to them considering that it is their UMNO that paid for them!

So much for purnishment!

But what is the most ridiculas thing is that the victim was also purnish! Crazy man!